Advanced Terminology in Reactive Training: Biomechanical Classifications and Performance Applications

Introduction

Reactive training, also known as plyometric training, represents a critical component in the development of power, speed, and athletic performance. The precise terminology used to describe these movements is essential for accurate programming, assessment, and communication among strength and conditioning professionals. This comprehensive guide expands upon the fundamental classifications of reactive movements to include their biomechanical underpinnings, neuromuscular demands, and practical applications in training prescription.

Reactive Training Movement Classifications

The following terminology provides a systematic framework for categorizing and understanding reactive training movements based on their takeoff and landing patterns, directional components, and execution characteristics:

Movement Type	Biomechanical Description	Key Performance Characteristics	Primary Energy System	Rate of Force Development
Linear Jump	Bilateral takeoff and landing in sagittal plane	• Symmetrical force distribution • Vertical ground reaction forces predominate • High triple extension coordination	ATP-PC	Very High
Lateral Jump	Bilateral takeoff and landing in frontal plane	• Medial-lateral stabilization demands<br>• Adductor/abductor engagement<br>• Frontal plane stability challenge	ATP-PC	High
Horizontal Jump	Bilateral takeoff and landing with anterior displacement	• Forward momentum generation<br>• Hip extensor emphasis<br>• Center of mass forward translation	ATP-PC	High
Linear Hop	Unilateral takeoff and landing (same leg) in sagittal plane	• Single-leg force absorption<br>• Asymmetrical loading pattern<br>• Increased joint stabilization demands	ATP-PC	Very High
Medial Hop	Unilateral takeoff and landing with medial displacement	• Frontal plane stabilization<br>• Pronation control<br>• Adductor complex loading	ATP-PC	Moderate-High
Lateral Hop	Unilateral takeoff and landing with lateral displacement	• Frontal plane stabilization<br>• Supination control<br>• Abductor complex loading	ATP-PC	Moderate-High
Linear Bound	Alternating unilateral takeoff and landing in sagittal plane	• Asymmetrical force production<br>• Contralateral coordination<br>• Increased horizontal propulsion	ATP-PC	Very High
Lateral Bound	Alternating unilateral takeoff and landing in frontal plane	• Complex frontal plane coordination<br>• High rotational stability demands<br>• Multi-planar control	ATP-PC	Very High

Advanced Movement Execution Variations

The following terms describe specific execution parameters that can be applied to modify the neuromuscular demands of the above movement classifications:

Execution Parameter	Neuromuscular Demand	Time Under Tension	Stabilization Requirement
Skip	• Rhythmic bilateral coordination<br>• Intermediate force production<br>• Enhanced elastic component utilization	Moderate	Moderate
Stick	• Eccentric deceleration emphasis<br>• High stabilization demand<br>• Proprioceptive acuity challenge	Extended	Very High
Bounce	• Short coupling time<br>• Stretch-shortening cycle optimization<br>• Elastic energy utilization	Minimal	Low-Moderate
Continuous	• Series elastic component emphasis<br>• Reactive strength development<br>• Minimal amortization phase	Minimal	Moderate
Transverse Plane	• Rotational force management<br>• Multi-planar coordination<br>• Increased proprioceptive challenge	Variable	Very High

Neurophysiological Basis of Reactive Training Movements

Understanding the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms that govern reactive training is essential for optimal programming and coaching. The following table outlines key physiological components involved in different reactive movement patterns:

Movement Classification	Primary Muscle Groups	Neural Adaptation	Recovery Requirement	Training Transfer
Bilateral Movements	• Quadriceps<br>• Gluteus Maximus<br>• Gastrocnemius/Soleus	• Motor unit synchronization<br>• Cross-education effect	Moderate	Team sports, Olympic lifting
Unilateral Movements	• Single-leg stabilizers<br>• Gluteus Medius<br>• Intrinsic foot muscles	• Improved intramuscular coordination<br>• Enhanced proprioception	High	Running sports, change of direction
Sagittal Plane Dominant	• Hip extensors<br>• Knee extensors<br>• Ankle plantarflexors	• Vertical force production<br>• Linear acceleration	Moderate	Sprinting, jumping
Frontal Plane Dominant	• Hip abductors/adductors<br>• Lateral stabilizers<br>• Ankle invertors/evertors	• Lateral force management<br>• Frontal plane stability	High	Court sports, multidirectional agility
Transverse Plane Dominant	• Core rotators<br>• Hip rotators<br>• Oblique systems	• Rotational force coupling<br>• Three-dimensional stabilization	Very High	Rotational sports (golf, tennis)

Progressive Programming Framework

Research by Verkhoshansky, Zatsiorsky, and contemporary scholars indicates the importance of systematic progression in reactive training. The following table presents a science-based progression model:

Training Phase	Volume (Foot Contacts)	Intensity	Rest Intervals	Primary Focus
Introductory	80-100	Low	1:5 work-to-rest ratio	Technique development, landing mechanics
Developmental	100-120	Moderate	1:4 work-to-rest ratio	Progressive loading, movement pattern expansion
Specialized	120-140	High	1:3 work-to-rest ratio	Sport-specific adaptations, power development
Performance	100-120	Very High	1:5 work-to-rest ratio	Peak power expression, competitive preparation

Practical Coaching Applications

Implementing precise reactive training terminology facilitates more effective coaching interventions:

Assessment and Movement Screening
- Utilize standardized reactive movement assessments to identify specific movement pattern deficiencies
- Quantify reactive strength index (RSI) through specific jump tests
- Screen for asymmetries using unilateral variations
Technique Coaching
- Focus on optimal foot positioning during takeoff and landing
- Emphasize neutral spine alignment throughout movement execution
- Maintain appropriate center of mass positioning relative to base of support
Programming Considerations
- Progressive integration from bilateral to unilateral movements
- Systematic advancement from sagittal to frontal to transverse plane movements
- Strategic manipulation of ground contact time (continuous vs. stick variations)
Performance Monitoring
- Track reactive strength index modifications across training phases
- Monitor ground contact times during continuous variations
- Assess force-velocity profiles through performance testing

References

Verkhoshansky, Y., & Siff, M. C. (2009). Supertraining (6th ed.). Verkhoshansky SSTM.
Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics.
Flanagan, E. P., & Comyns, T. M. (2008). The use of contact time and the reactive strength index to optimize fast stretch-shortening cycle training. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 30(5), 32-38.
Schoenfeld, B. J. (2010). The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(10), 2857-2872.
Cormie, P., McGuigan, M. R., & Newton, R. U. (2011). Developing maximal neuromuscular power: Part 1—biological basis of maximal power production. Sports Medicine, 41(1), 17-38.
King, I. (2000). Foundations of physical preparation. King Sports International.
Poliquin, C. (2012). The Poliquin principles: Successful methods for strength and mass development. Dayton Publications.
Hatfield, F. C. (1989). Power: A scientific approach. Contemporary Books.
Chek, P. (2001). Movement that matters. C.H.E.K Institute.
Francis, C., & Patterson, P. (1992). The Charlie Francis training system. TBLI Publications.
Schmidtbleicher, D. (1992). Training for power events. In P. V. Komi (Ed.), Strength and power in sport (pp. 381-395). Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Siff, M. C. (2003). Supertraining. Supertraining Institute.
Simmons, L. (2007). The Westside Barbell book of methods. Westside Barbell.
Goss, K. (2003). Jumping into plyometrics. Human Kinetics.
Boyle, M. (2016). New functional training for sports (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics.
Kraemer, W. J., & Fleck, S. J. (2007). Optimizing strength training: Designing nonlinear periodization workouts. Human Kinetics.
Newton, R. U., & Kraemer, W. J. (1994). Developing explosive muscular power: Implications for a mixed methods training strategy. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 16(5), 20-31.
Young, W. B., Pryor, J. F., & Wilson, G. J. (1995). Effect of instructions on characteristics of countermovement and drop jump performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 9(4), 232-236.
Bobbert, M. F. (1990). Drop jumping as a training method for jumping ability. Sports Medicine, 9(1), 7-22.
Ebben, W. P. (2007). Practical guidelines for plyometric intensity. NSCA’s Performance Training Journal, 6(5), 12-16.